From news-rocq!jussieu.fr!oleane!portc04.blue.aol.com!audrey01.news.aol.com!not-for-mail Thu Jul 29 20:38:26 1999 Article: 10460 of rec.games.corewar Path: news-rocq!jussieu.fr!oleane!portc04.blue.aol.com!audrey01.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: happycan@aol.comjnkkil (Marshall) Newsgroups: rec.games.corewar Subject: Re: criticism/help please... Lines: 58 NNTP-Posting-Host: ladder07.news.aol.com X-Admin: news@aol.com Date: 26 Jul 1999 22:54:22 GMT References: <933019733.17353@www.remarq.com> Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com Message-ID: <19990726185422.13064.00001894@ng-ck1.aol.com> Xref: news-rocq rec.games.corewar:10460 ::grumbles about quoting not working:: heres that code from the last post: Here is what I would do. SPL 1 SPL 1 ;make 8 processes SPL 1 p1 SPL @0, >100 ; step size and weak increment attack MOV }p1, >p1 ;replication MOV pb, >p1 MOV pb, >p1 ;carpet bombing MOV pb, >p1 MOV {p1, aim ;allows skipping of counter reset MOV aim, >aim MOV aim, >aim MOV aim, >aim ; a bigger carpet of bombs MOV aim, >tep this is more efficient, no more wasted processes. What is a good step size? is there a way to figure that out, or do you just mess with it until its works well? it still needs one of those q-scan thingies, but what is a q-scan and how to i make one? thanks for the help Marshall ::is struck dumb by the size of his redcode inexperiance::